Counting votes during Jordan’s 2016 elections. Photo credit: Wikimedia/Mohammad Hajeer (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Freedom House Rating
Parliamentary Constitutional Monarchy
November 10, 2020
August 2021 (due)
August 15, 2017
September 20, 2016
Jordan has scheduled parliamentary elections for November 10, 2020. Voters will elect all 115 members of the House of Representatives, the lower house of Jordan’s parliament (members of the Senate, the upper house, are chosen by the king).
Jordan is a monarchy and in general, the king exercises executive authority. King Abdullah II, the current monarch, is seen as a reformer and enjoys widespread popularity both in Jordan and internationally. He has encouraged a gradualist path toward greater democracy, and permitted more political space than some other monarchies in the region. Nonetheless, opposition figures and those who protest sometime do face arrest.
Jordan holds regular elections for the lower house of parliament and local councils. Abdullah has indicated a desire to move toward a political system based on parties that compete on their platforms, but in practice, recent elections have been dominated by independent candidates who are tribal leaders or wealthy business people. Constantly-changing rules make it difficult for parties to compete.
In the 2016 parliamentary elections, whose turnout was 36 percent, 99 of the 130 seats went to independent candidates. The Islamic Action Front (IAF), the political wing of the Jordanian chapter of the Muslim Brotherhood, won more seats than any other party, after having boycotted the previous two elections. The IAF ran on a reform platform, and partnered with non-Islamists, in an effort to broaden its appeal. Still, it won only 10 out of 130 seats (and its coalition partners won 5 seats). Furthermore, IAF did not compete in all of the electoral districts, and it won less than 12 percent of the vote in the districts where it did compete.
The IAF is not boycotting this year’s elections – it has instead chosen to compete.
Reform movements have emerged in student union and trade union elections. For example, in 2018 student union elections (which can serve as a barometer for national politics), a new reformist movement called Nashama (Gallantry), opposed to corruption and tribalism, won more seats than the Islamists. The 2020 elections could see these types of candidates elected to parliament.
Jordan has hard-won and potentially fragile stability. The government has close ties with the United States and the Gulf States. Jordan has had a peace treaty with Israel since 1994 (prior to that, the two countries had been in a state of war for 46 years). However, recent Israeli plans to annex the West Bank have led to tension, which could have region-wide implications.
Osama Al Sharif, Al-Monitor (November 12, 2020): Voter apathy, pandemic result in low turnout, riots in Jordanian election
AFP (November 12, 2020): Jordanian parliamentary elections see women, Islamists lose out
Nicole Robinson, Heritage Foundation (November 10, 2020): Jordanians Head to the Polls Amid Mounting Economic and Health Crisis
Al Jazeera (November 8, 2020): Jordan’s elections explained in 500 words
Osama Al Sharif, Al-Monitor (October 1, 2020): Islamists gear up for elections in Jordan amid widespread voter apathy
Taylor Luck, The National (September 27, 2020): Jordan prepares for elections amid anger over Covid-19 missteps
AFP (September 21, 2020): Jordan’s Muslim Brotherhood to take part in parliamentary elections – Political wing of Islamist group says boycotting November 10 vote would be ‘derogation of responsibility’
Sean Yom and Wael Al-Khatib, Washington Post’s Monkey Cage (May 17, 2018): Islamists are losing support in Jordan
Kristen Kao, Washington Post’s Monkey Cage (October 3, 2016): How Jordan’s election revealed enduring weaknesses in its political system
Kirk H. Sowell, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (September 30, 2016): Takeaways From Jordan’s Elections
21votes does not necessarily agree with all of the opinions expressed in the linked articles; rather, our goal is to curate a wide range of voices. Furthermore, none of the individuals or organizations referenced have reviewed 21votes’ content, and their inclusion should not be taken to imply that they endorse us in any way. More on our approach here.
Updated November 15, 2020